Библиография

1. 1. Maiewski E.V., Malova H.V., Popov V.Y., Zelenyi L.M. Ulysses flyby in theheliosphere: Comparison of the solar wind model with observational data // Universe. 2022. V. 8(6). Art.ID. 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8060324
2. 2. Koomen M., Detwiler C., Brueckner G. et al. White lightcoronagraph in OSO-7 // Applied Optics. 1975. V. 14(3). P. 743–751.
3. 3. Chikunova G., Dissauer K., Podladchikova T. et al. Coronal dimmings associated with coronal mass ejections on the solar limb // Astrophysical J. 2020. V. 896(1). Art.ID. 17. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9105
4. 4. Wilson L.B. III, Brosius A.L., Gopalswamy N. et al. A quarter century of wind spacecraft discoveries // Reviews of Geophysics. 2021. V. 59(2). Art.ID. e2020RG000714. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000714
5. 5. Wilson L.B. III. Wind 2020 senior review proposal. https://wind.nasa.gov/docs/Wind_SR2020_proposal.pdf
6. 6. Lepping R., Acũna M., Burlaga L. et al. The wind magnetic field investigation // Space Science Reviews. 1995. 71. P. 207–229.
7. 7. Adhikari L., Khabarova O., Zank G.P. et al. The role of magnetic reconnection–associated processes in local particle acceleration in the solar wind // Astrophysical J. 2019. V. 873(1). Art.ID. 72. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab05c6
8. 8. Bale S., Badman S., Bonnell J. et al. Highly structured slow solar wind emerging from an equatorial coronal hole // Nature. 2019. V. 576(7786). P. 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1818-7
9. 9. Alberti T., Consolini G., Carbone V. et al. Multifractal and chaotic properties of solar wind at MHD and kinetic domains: An empirical mode decomposition approach // Entropy. 2019. V.21(3). Art.ID. 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21030320
10. 10. Prasad P.K., Gowrisankar A., Saha A. et al. Dynamical properties and fractal patterns of nonlinear waves in solar wind plasma // Physica Scripta. 2020. V. 95(6). Art.ID. 065603. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab833c
11. 11. Godsil C., Royle G.F. Algebraic graph theory. Part of the book series: Graduate Texts in Mathematics. V. 207. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.
12. 12. Kalofolias V. How to learn a graph from smooth signals // Artificial intelligence and statistics. P. 920–929. PMLR, 2016.
13. 13. Pal M., Samanta S., Ghorai G. Modern trends in fuzzy graph theory. Springer, 2020.
14. 14. Cheng S.-W., Cheong O., Lee T. et al. Fitting a graph to one-dimensional data // Theoretical Computer Science. 2021. Iss. 867. P. 40–49.
15. 15. Daitch S.I., Kelner J.A., Spielman D.A. Fitting a graph to vector data // Proc. 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. Montreal, Canada. 2009. P. 201–208.
16. 16. Shugay Y., Slemzin V., Veselovsky I. Magnetic field sector structure and origins of solar wind streams in 2012 // J. Space Weather and Space Climate. 2014. V. 4. Art.ID. A24.
17. 17. Antonov Y., Zakharov V., Myagkova I. et al. Structure and dynamics for graphs of interplanetary magnetic field vectors // Cosmic Research. 2024. V. 62(2). P. 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952523600336
18. 18. Kilpua E., Isavnin A., Vourlidas A. et al. On the relationship between interplanetary coronal mass ejections and magnetic clouds // Annales Geophysicae. 2013. V. 31(7). P. 1251–1265.
19. 19. Shaikh Z.I., Raghav A.N. Statistical plasma properties of the planar and nonplanar ICME magnetic clouds during solar cycles 23 and 24 // Astrophysical J. 2022. V. 938(2). Art.ID. 146. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac8f2b
20. 20. Wu C.-C., Gopalswamy N., Lepping R.P. et al. Characteristics of magnetic clouds and interplanetary coronal mass ejections which cause intense geomagnetic storms // Terrestrial, Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences. 2013. V. 24(2).
21. 21. Ghag K., Sathe B., Raghav A. et al. Statistical study of geo-effectiveness of planar magnetic structures evolved within ICME’s // Universe. 2023. V. 9(8). Art.ID. 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9080350
22. 22. Thalmann J., Dumboviс M., Dissauer K. et al. Tracking magnetic flux and helicity from the Sun to Earth: Multi-spacecraft analysis of a magnetic cloud and its solar source // Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2023. V. 669. Art.ID. A72. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244248
23. 23. Manchester W. IV, Kozyra J., Lepri S. et al. Simulation of magnetic cloud erosion during propagation // J. Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2014. V. 119(7). P. 5449–5464.
24. 24. Li L., Chen T., Shen C. et al. Near-surface atmospheric electric field changes through magnetic clouds via coronal mass ejections // Geoscience Letters. 2023. V. 10(1). Art.ID. 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-023-00299-2
25. 25. Cane H., Richardson I. Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-earth solar wind during 1996–2002 // J. Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2003. V. 108(A4).
26. 26. Richardson I.G., Cane H.V. Near-earth interplanetary coronal mass ejections during solar cycle 23 (1996–2009): Catalog and summary of properties // Solar Physics. 2010. Iss. 264. P. 189–237.
27. 27. Antonov J.A., Tsyganov M.V., Suhareva N.A. Topological properties of satellite monitoring time series for the interplanetary magnetic field // 29th International Symposium on Atmospheric and Ocean Optics: Atmospheric Physics. Moscow, Russia. 2023. V. 12780. P. 1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2690853
28. 28. Landau L.D., Lifshits E.M. Mechanics. V. 1. CUP Archive, 1960.
29. 29. McConnell A.J. Applications of tensor analysis. Courier Corporation, 2014.
30. 30. Goodman J.W. Statistical optics. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
31. 31. Xie C., Zhong W., Mueller K. A visual analytics approach for categorical joint distribution reconstruction from marginal projections // IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2016. V. 23(1). P. 51–60.
32. 32. Sadovnikov B., Inozemtseva N., Perepelkin E. Generalized phase space and conservative systems // Doklady Mathematics. 2013. V. 88. P. 457–459.
33. 33. Perepelkin E.E., Sadovnikov B.I., Inozemtseva N.G. et al. Universal density matrix for the phase space // arXiv preprint. 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.04950
34. 34. Perepelkin E.E., Sadovnikov B.I., Inozemtseva N.G. et al. Exact time-dependent solution of the Schroedinger equation, its generalization to the phase space and relation to the gibbs distribution // Physica Scripta. 2022. V. 98(1). Art.ID. 015221.
35. 35. Perepelkin E.E., Sadovnikov B.I., Inozemtseva N.G. et al. Dispersion chain of quantum mechanics equations // J. Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 2023. V. 56(14). Art.ID. 145202. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/acbd71